Paris Climate Conference Results In Landmark Agreement To Curb Greenhouse Gas Emissions

By - 544 words

Language

Reading Level

Listen to Article

Singapore Minister of Foreign Affairs Dr Vivian Balakrishnan (second from left) and Chief Negotiator Mr Kwok Fook Seng (third from left) applauding at the Paris Climate Conference. Photo: Dr Vivian Balakrishnan/Facebook

Two weeks ago, representatives from 196 countries arrived in Paris to resolve one of the world's most pressing problems — Climate change. On Saturday, December 12th, the group emerged victorious with the first-ever global accord in the fight against global warming — One that U.S. President Obama hailed as the "turning point for the world" and the "best chance to save the one planet we've got."

The agreement's overriding goal is to ensure that average global temperatures increase by no more than 2°C (3.6°F) above pre-industrial levels. This according to environmentalists is a critical threshold above which the planet could experience irreversible impacts — Catastrophes like greater sea level rises and widespread plant and animal extinction.

Photo Credit: climateactiontracker.org

To ensure this does not happen all 196 nations have agreed to decrease the use of fossil fuels that generate heat-trapping greenhouse gas emissions like methane and carbon dioxide as soon as possible. The agreement also stipulates that by 2050, man-made emissions should be reduced to levels that can be absorbed by our forests and oceans.

The pact does not bind countries to a particular carbon emission level. Instead, it allows each nation to establish an easy reduction target and outline a strategy of how they plan to get there. Government officials are also urged to review the plan every four years to ensure they are meeting their goals and find ways to decrease emission rates further if possible.

Photo Credit: Insideclimatenews.org

There is also no penalty for countries that fail to abide by their self-imposed targets. However, the representatives hope that the fact that the world will know about their progress will encourage nations to try their best. Also, while developed countries are expected to cut their absolute emissions, developing countries are only "encouraged" to do so.

Wealthy developed nations like the United States also committed to giving $100 billion USD of funding annually by 2020, to assist the poorest and most at-risk countries to deal with the impacts of climate change and build low-carbon technologies.

Image Credit: PricewaterhouseCooper

Though the terms have been agreed upon in principle, the agreement still needs to be approved by the each country. It will go into effect as soon as 55 nations that together account for 55% of global greenhouse gas emissions agree to the terms.

Most experts believe that ratification should not be a problem given there are no legal obligations being imposed on any nation. Besides, the world's biggest polluters, U.S.A. and China that account for 14% and 24% of total greenhouse gas emissions respectively, have already announced plans to cut emissions substantially. Their joint pact in November 2014, is what paved the way for the Paris deal, and inspired nearly all the world's nations to announce similar plans.

Photo Credit: International Panel on Climate Change – Fifth Assessment Report (AR5)

The agreement is not all that environmentalists had hoped for. However, they are encouraged at the collective resolve, especially given that the 2009 climate conference in Copenhagen was a complete failure. As Bill Mckibben the co-founder of the international environmental organization 350.org says, "This (the agreement) didn't save the planet. "But it may have saved the chance of saving the planet." Hopefully, all the countries will realize that living up to their promise is the only way to save our planet and ourselves, from what could become an irreversible situation.

Resources: cnn.com,wwf.org,350.org

Cite Article
Geography
Learn Keywords in this Article
140 Comments
  • xmed8
    xmed8almost 9 years
    it is really interesting follow me my user is xmed8 im cool i need followers
    • dulajperera
      dulajpereraalmost 9 years
      It's a good thing that many parts of the world have agreed to try to make the world a safer place to stay. This will substantially decrease any chances of sea level rises and unusual climate changes. Everyone must go green. For example, they mustn't be reading newspapers, instead they could be reading online. People just don't realize the harm that they can do even from small things.
      • AKalmost 9 years
        I'm glad this is happening!
        • awsomegamer10almost 9 years
          that is bad to say
          • awsomegamer10almost 9 years
            don't say that
            • coolpopalmost 9 years
              so right
              • horse lover101almost 9 years
                who thinks donald trump is ganna win?
                • kobwebby
                  kobwebbyalmost 9 years
                  wrong topic, but on that note, Trump is actually doing quite well in the polls. However he faces a lot of opposition from the media and other candidates so he may drop out by next year.
                  • krazykid2468
                    krazykid2468almost 9 years
                    I hope not
                  • svetochka
                    svetochkaalmost 9 years
                    wow!!! but did you know that venus is the hottest planet so there must be some life out there because it has the greenhouse gas also.!
                    • coolguyalmost 9 years
                      There is actully significant evidence there is no such thing as global warming. In addition, temperature also increased in the medival age, in which nobody was burning fuel.
                      • kobwebby
                        kobwebbyalmost 9 years
                        The raise may not have been significant, but people back then were definitely burning wood.
                      • yoloalmost 9 years
                        what will happen if France doesn't do this?
                        • kobwebby
                          kobwebbyalmost 9 years
                          That would be really ironic. And it would break the pact.